Hawk Eye

Comments (3)

All Hawk Eye Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • T

    The ChiefDec 19, 2013 at 9:19 pm

    Golden Bear: if fighting isn’t the reason for poor ratings, what is? I think Luke makes a valid point here. Why exactly did the NHL evolve into a fighting-frenzy sport? In any other sport, fighting is highly frowned upon; it results in penalties within the game and large fines after the game. What makes it OK for NHL players to do it? Culture? Tradition?

    Reply
  • Z

    Zach LauferDec 18, 2013 at 1:56 pm

    I agree with golden bear. Although well-written, Luke, you take examples out of context to get your point across. Fights spark energy for both teams, in my opinion.

    Reply
  • G

    Golden BearDec 18, 2013 at 11:34 am

    This article makes a weak point that fighting is bad for the NHL, especially considering the three examples referenced have nothing to do with hockey fights. They were all cheap shots that had nothing to do with two players dropping their gloves and squaring off. Most fans of hockey understand that the fight could be used as a way to spark energy into their team, or to ensure that the opposing team doesn’t take cheap shots at your team’s star players. I also doubt that fighting is the REASON for poor TV ratings. If you consider the constantly growing popularity of mixed martial arts, such as UFC, you can assume that fighting isn’t the reason for poor TV ratings.

    Reply
Activate Search
Fighting should be taken out of hockey